{"id":74,"date":"2007-06-07T08:24:00","date_gmt":"2007-06-07T13:24:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogue.uqam.ca\/consumption\/beyond-kyoto\/"},"modified":"2007-06-07T08:24:00","modified_gmt":"2007-06-07T13:24:00","slug":"beyond-kyoto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogue.uqam.ca\/consumption\/2007\/06\/07\/beyond-kyoto\/","title":{"rendered":"Beyond Kyoto"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;text-align: justify\"><span lang=\"EN-CA\">The G8 summit is an occasion for me to make a return on the chronicle \u00abKyoto and consumption\u00bb chronicle, published on April 27, 2007, in which I wrote: \u00abAre those highly virtuous citizens, allegedly worried about the environment, truly willing to make an effort to change their habits and reduce their consumption?\u00bb<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">  <\/div>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;text-align: justify\"><span lang=\"EN-CA\">I was then, and still remain, with good reason, sceptic about the will of Quebecers, like citizens of other provinces and countries, to make an effort to reduce polluting emissions. True, a minority of citizens is willing to radically change their way of life to safeguard the planet, but such is not the case of the majority. Evidence of this can be found in the article \u00ab <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cyberpresse.ca\/article\/20070530\/CPACTUALITES\/705300684\/0\/CPPRESSE\">Environnement : oui aux mesures indolores<\/a> \u00bb (Environment: yes to painless measures), published on Wednesday May 30 2007 in La Presse daily newspaper. Journalist Fran\u00e7ois Cardinal wrote: \u00abA very large majority of Quebecers are ready to act to counter climatic changes provided that this action does not require any sacrifice on their part.\u00bb<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">  <\/div>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;text-align: justify\"><span lang=\"EN-CA\">This article is based on the \u00ab<span class=\"titreresultats\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.inspq.qc.ca\/pdf\/publications\/618-ChangClimatMeridionalPercep.pdf\"><i>Changements climatiques au Qu\u00e9bec m\u00e9ridional: perceptions de la population g\u00e9n\u00e9rale et suggestions d&#8217;adaptations futures<\/i><\/a>\u00bb (Climatic changes in southern Quebec: perceptions of the population at large and suggestions for future adaptations)<\/span><i> <\/i>survey from the \u00abInstitut national de sant\u00e9 publique du Qu\u00e9bec\u00bb (Quebec national institute of public health). Here is an eloquent extract (page VIII): \u00abBesides, it would seem that a majority of citizens would support national and international initiatives in as far as they do not require a significant change in their life style or sacrifice of their comfort for collective well being and in as much as that does not cost them a penny. Lastly, the majority would also have a strong attachment to <i>status quo<\/i> and would risk more to avoid a loss than to obtain a benefit.\u00bb<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">  <\/div>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;text-align: justify\"><span lang=\"EN-CA\">For millennia, the earth has gone through several cycles of warming and cooling; the current one is undoubtedly more pronounced due to human activity. This is not a reason to panic the population, set unattainable objectives and propose impracticable solutions. Obviously, it is imperative to act\u2026 intelligently. I favour setting perhaps less ambitious, but realistic objectives. Privileged solutions must be simple to implement and not constitute an obstacle to the population\u2019s way of life, a position supported by Mario Roy.<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">  <\/div>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;text-align: justify\"><span lang=\"EN-CA\">In an editorial published on Monday February 5 207 in La Presse (page A15) this journalist wrote: \u00abQuebecers talk big about being world champions of the environment. [\u2026] Why are Quebecers opposed are to a rise in electricity tariffs and to exploitation of hydraulic power? [\u2026] Why have sales of the largest and most luxurious sports utility vehicles (SUV) progressed by 17% and 6% respectively in Canada in 2006?\u00bb Amongst other things, he attributes this apparent contradiction to the fact \u00abthat the citizen indicates he will not sacrifice comfort and freedom which modernity gives him.\u00bb He looks upon technological development as a promising way to find solutions to climate warming: \u00abLike the industrialist, the citizen will put a price on his sacrifices. Better still, he will prefer new clean technologies to them, new green processes, correct ecological behaviours\u2026 as long as they are without pain.\u00bb<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">  <\/div>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;text-align: justify\"><span lang=\"EN-CA\">Humans have shown their inventiveness at the time of humanity\u2019s greatest crises; science has the made colossal progress. Think of antibiotics, technologies of communications, data processing and nuclear energy, which have resulted from research undertaken during the Second World War.<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">  <\/div>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0001pt;text-align: justify\"><span lang=\"EN-CA\">The same will be true today, provided that we devote resources and energies needed, rather than remaining locked up us in sterile polemics.<\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">  <span lang=\"EN-CA\">What do you think it?<\/span><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The G8 summit is an occasion for me to make a return on the chronicle \u00abKyoto and consumption\u00bb chronicle, published on April 27, 2007, in which I wrote: \u00abAre those highly virtuous citizens, allegedly worried about the environment, truly willing to make an effort to change their habits and reduce their consumption?\u00bb I was then, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogue.uqam.ca\/consumption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogue.uqam.ca\/consumption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogue.uqam.ca\/consumption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogue.uqam.ca\/consumption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogue.uqam.ca\/consumption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogue.uqam.ca\/consumption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogue.uqam.ca\/consumption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogue.uqam.ca\/consumption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogue.uqam.ca\/consumption\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}